Frequently Asked Questions and troubleshooting
I'm experiencing deadlocks using PyO3 with lazy_static or once_cell!
lazy_static
and once_cell::sync
both use locks to ensure that initialization is performed only by a single thread. Because the Python GIL is an additional lock this can lead to deadlocks in the following way:
- A thread (thread A) which has acquired the Python GIL starts initialization of a
lazy_static
value. - The initialization code calls some Python API which temporarily releases the GIL e.g.
Python::import
. - Another thread (thread B) acquires the Python GIL and attempts to access the same
lazy_static
value. - Thread B is blocked, because it waits for
lazy_static
's initialization to lock to release. - Thread A is blocked, because it waits to re-acquire the GIL which thread B still holds.
- Deadlock.
PyO3 provides a struct GILOnceCell
which works equivalently to OnceCell
but relies solely on the Python GIL for thread safety. This means it can be used in place of lazy_static
or once_cell
where you are experiencing the deadlock described above. See the documentation for GILOnceCell
for an example how to use it.
I can't run cargo test
; or I can't build in a Cargo workspace: I'm having linker issues like "Symbol not found" or "Undefined reference to _PyExc_SystemError"!
Currently, #340 causes cargo test
to fail with linking errors when the extension-module
feature is activated. Linking errors can also happen when building in a cargo workspace where a different crate also uses PyO3 (see #2521). For now, there are three ways we can work around these issues.
- Make the
extension-module
feature optional. Build withmaturin develop --features "extension-module"
[dependencies.pyo3]
version = "0.19.1"
[features]
extension-module = ["pyo3/extension-module"]
- Make the
extension-module
feature optional and default. Run tests withcargo test --no-default-features
:
[dependencies.pyo3]
version = "0.19.1"
[features]
extension-module = ["pyo3/extension-module"]
default = ["extension-module"]
- If you are using a
pyproject.toml
file to control maturin settings, add the following section:
[tool.maturin]
features = ["pyo3/extension-module"]
# Or for maturin 0.12:
# cargo-extra-args = ["--features", "pyo3/extension-module"]
I can't run cargo test
: my crate cannot be found for tests in tests/
directory!
The Rust book suggests to put integration tests inside a tests/
directory.
For a PyO3 extension-module
project where the crate-type
is set to "cdylib"
in your Cargo.toml
,
the compiler won't be able to find your crate and will display errors such as E0432
or E0463
:
error[E0432]: unresolved import `my_crate`
--> tests/test_my_crate.rs:1:5
|
1 | use my_crate;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ no external crate `my_crate`
The best solution is to make your crate types include both rlib
and cdylib
:
# Cargo.toml
[lib]
crate-type = ["cdylib", "rlib"]
Ctrl-C doesn't do anything while my Rust code is executing!
This is because Ctrl-C raises a SIGINT signal, which is handled by the calling Python process by simply setting a flag to action upon later. This flag isn't checked while Rust code called from Python is executing, only once control returns to the Python interpreter.
You can give the Python interpreter a chance to process the signal properly by calling Python::check_signals
. It's good practice to call this function regularly if you have a long-running Rust function so that your users can cancel it.
#[pyo3(get)]
clones my field!
You may have a nested struct similar to this:
#![allow(unused)] fn main() { use pyo3::prelude::*; #[pyclass] #[derive(Clone)] struct Inner {/* fields omitted */} #[pyclass] struct Outer { #[pyo3(get)] inner: Inner, } #[pymethods] impl Outer { #[new] fn __new__() -> Self { Self { inner: Inner {} } } } }
When Python code accesses Outer
's field, PyO3 will return a new object on every access (note that their addresses are different):
outer = Outer()
a = outer.inner
b = outer.inner
assert a is b, f"a: {a}\nb: {b}"
AssertionError: a: <builtins.Inner object at 0x00000238FFB9C7B0>
b: <builtins.Inner object at 0x00000238FFB9C830>
This can be especially confusing if the field is mutable, as getting the field and then mutating it won't persist - you'll just get a fresh clone of the original on the next access. Unfortunately Python and Rust don't agree about ownership - if PyO3 gave out references to (possibly) temporary Rust objects to Python code, Python code could then keep that reference alive indefinitely. Therefore returning Rust objects requires cloning.
If you don't want that cloning to happen, a workaround is to allocate the field on the Python heap and store a reference to that, by using Py<...>
:
#![allow(unused)] fn main() { use pyo3::prelude::*; #[pyclass] #[derive(Clone)] struct Inner {/* fields omitted */} #[pyclass] struct Outer { #[pyo3(get)] inner: Py<Inner>, } #[pymethods] impl Outer { #[new] fn __new__(py: Python<'_>) -> PyResult<Self> { Ok(Self { inner: Py::new(py, Inner {})?, }) } } }
This time a
and b
are the same object:
outer = Outer()
a = outer.inner
b = outer.inner
assert a is b, f"a: {a}\nb: {b}"
print(f"a: {a}\nb: {b}")
a: <builtins.Inner object at 0x0000020044FCC670>
b: <builtins.Inner object at 0x0000020044FCC670>
The downside to this approach is that any Rust code working on the Outer
struct now has to acquire the GIL to do anything with its field.
I want to use the pyo3
crate re-exported from from dependency but the proc-macros fail!
All PyO3 proc-macros (#[pyclass]
, #[pyfunction]
, #[derive(FromPyObject)]
and so on) expect the pyo3
crate to be available under that name in your crate
root, which is the normal situation when pyo3
is a direct dependency of your
crate.
However, when the dependency is renamed, or your crate only indirectly depends
on pyo3
, you need to let the macro code know where to find the crate. This is
done with the crate
attribute:
#![allow(unused)] fn main() { use pyo3::prelude::*; pub extern crate pyo3; mod reexported { pub use ::pyo3; } #[pyclass] #[pyo3(crate = "reexported::pyo3")] struct MyClass; }
I'm trying to call Python from Rust but I get STATUS_DLL_NOT_FOUND
or STATUS_ENTRYPOINT_NOT_FOUND
!
This happens on Windows when linking to the python DLL fails or the wrong one is linked. The Python DLL on Windows will usually be called something like:
python3X.dll
for Python 3.X, e.g.python310.dll
for Python 3.10python3.dll
when using PyO3'sabi3
feature
The DLL needs to be locatable using the Windows DLL search order. The two easiest ways to achieve this are:
- Put the Python DLL in the same folder as your build artifacts
- Add the directory containing the Python DLL to your
PATH
environment variable, for exampleC:\Users\<You>\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python310
- If this happens when you are distributing your program, consider using PyOxidizer to package it with your binary.
If the wrong DLL is linked it is possible that this happened because another program added itself and its own Python DLLs to PATH
. Rearrange your PATH
variables to give the correct DLL priority.
Note: Changes to
PATH
(or any other environment variable) are not visible to existing shells. Restart it for changes to take effect.
For advanced troubleshooting, Dependency Walker can be used to diagnose linking errors.