Python Functions
PyO3 supports two ways to define a free function in Python. Both require registering the function to a module.
One way is defining the function in the module definition.
use pyo3::prelude::*;
#[pymodule]
fn rust2py(py: Python, m: &PyModule) -> PyResult<()> {
// Note that the `#[pyfn()]` annotation automatically converts the arguments from
// Python objects to Rust values; and the Rust return value back into a Python object.
#[pyfn(m, "sum_as_string")]
fn sum_as_string_py(_py: Python, a:i64, b:i64) -> PyResult<String> {
Ok(format!("{}", a + b))
}
Ok(())
}
fn main() {}
The other is annotating a function with #[pyfunction]
and then adding it
to the module using the wrap_pyfunction!
macro.
use pyo3::prelude::*;
use pyo3::wrap_pyfunction;
#[pyfunction]
fn double(x: usize) -> usize {
x * 2
}
#[pymodule]
fn module_with_functions(py: Python, m: &PyModule) -> PyResult<()> {
m.add_wrapped(wrap_pyfunction!(double)).unwrap();
Ok(())
}
fn main() {}
Making the function signature available to Python
In order to make the function signature available to Python to be retrieved via
inspect.signature
, simply make sure the first line of your docstring is
formatted like in the example below. Please note that the newline after the
--
is mandatory. The /
signifies the end of positional-only arguments. This
is not a feature of this library in particular, but the general format used by
CPython for annotating signatures of built-in functions. Function signatures for
built-ins are new in Python 3 — in Python 2, they are simply considered to be a
part of the docstring.
#![allow(unused_variables)]
fn main() {
use pyo3::prelude::*;
/// add(a, b, /)
/// --
///
/// This function adds two unsigned 64-bit integers.
#[pyfunction]
fn add(a: u64, b: u64) -> u64 {
a + b
}
}
When annotated like this, signatures are also correctly displayed in IPython.
>>> pyo3_test.add?
Signature: pyo3_test.add(a, b, /)
Docstring: This function adds two unsigned 64-bit integers.
Type: builtin_function_or_method
Closures
Currently, there are no conversions between Fn
s in Rust and callables in Python. This would definitely be possible and very useful, so contributions are welcome. In the meantime, you can do the following:
Calling a Python function in Rust
You can use ObjectProtocol::is_callable
to check if you got a callable, which is true for functions (including lambdas), methods and objects with a __call__
method. You can call the object with ObjectProtocol::call
with the args as first parameter and the kwargs (or None
) as second parameter. There are also ObjectProtocol::call0
with no args and ObjectProtocol::call1
with only the positional args.
Calling Rust Fn
s in Python
If you have a static function, you can expose it with #[pyfunction]
and use wrap_pyfunction!
to get the corresponding PyObject
. For dynamic functions, e.g. lambda and functions that were passed as arguments, you must put them in some kind of owned container, e.g. a box. (A long-term solution will be a special container similar to wasm-bindgen's Closure
). You can then use a #[pyclass]
struct with that container as a field as a way to pass the function over the FFI barrier. You can even make that class callable with __call__
so it looks like a function in Python code.